Nasal surgery. Results of nasal surgery are largely controversial. It appears to be widely accepted that underlying nasal pathology, such as hypertrophic inferior turbinates, nasal polyps or deviated nasal septum, should be treated and the patient re-assessed before considering palatal surgery (Carney and Robinson 1995).
Craniofacial surgery. Advancement mandibular osteotomy and maxillary osteotomy have also been reported (Borowiecki and Sassin 1983, Douglas 1993), but are only used for congenital craniofacial defects such as retrognathia.
Expansion hyoidoplasty. In cases where the tongue is the main site of obstruction, expansion hyoidoplasty and base of tongue resection have been developed (Gray and Hawthorne 1992).
Tracheostomy. Permanent tracheostomy was once the only effective treatment for those patients in whom no corrective pathology could be identified (Sher et al 1985). It was first used for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome in 1969, in a patient with Pickwickian syndrome (Borowiecki and Sassin 1983, Guilleminault et al 1981). Cotton (1983) stated that: ‘ln our present state of knowledge, tracheostomy is the only certain cure for life-threatening obstructive sleep apnoea in adults.’ Although technology has advanced considerably, cases of obstructive sleep apnoea still exist in which a permanent tracheostomy is indicated to ensure the patient survival. A tracheostomy can have a devastating impact on the patient, leaving him or her aesthetically disfigured and requiring strict hygienic care. It can result in inadequate voice production and exposes the patient to the risk of iatrogenic tracheal stenosis (Borowiedti and Sassin 1983, Zohar et al 1993).
Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UVPP). This involves:
• Removal of the tonsils (if present)
• Removal of the redundant folds of tissue around the palatopharyngeus and palatoglossus muscles
• Resection of the distal 1cm of soft palate and related uvula. The technique causes scarring and increased rigidity in the palatopharyngeus isthmus (Gray and Rutka 1988, O’Donoghue et al 1992).
Patients must be carefully selected – many of them will already have intermittent airway obstruction, be overweight and may have coexisting respiratory or cardiovascular disease. They are at risk of post-operative oedema and of increased mortality or morbidity. If nasal surgery is performed at the same time, nasal packing may be required which will further compromise the airway (Camey and Robinson 1995). UVPP has a number of complications and side-effects (below – Cotton 1983, Friberg et al 1995, Haavisto and Suonoaa 1994, Simmons et al 1983) and there have been fatalities (Haavisto and Suonoaa 1994).
• Post-operative pain
• Palatal stenosis
• Velopharyngeal insufficiency (manifested as nasal regurgitation and changes in voice quality)
• Hypernasality
• Pharyngeal dryness
• Secondary haemorrhage
• Breakdown of surgical closure
• Dysphagia
• Loss of taste
• Airway problems
Laser palatoplasty. A less radical surgical treatment, laser palatoplasty, is now being used in some centres. This apparently reduces snoring in 85 per cent of cases (Carney and Robinson 1995). A strip of inferior soft palate is excised, causing fibrosis and palatal stiffening. This procedure is said to have fewer side effects than UVPP.